顯示具有 Litigation 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Litigation 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2016年6月28日 星期二

Uniloc公司 VS Tencent公司

人:Uniloc公司VS騰訊(Tencent)公司
事:控告大陸知名通訊軟體「微信」侵權
時:2016/6
地:美國
物:指控微信的語音群聊、視頻群聊等功能侵犯其兩項與電話會議技術相關的專利,要求微信立即中止這些功能,微信母公司騰訊恐將面臨巨額賠償。

摘要:
1992Uniloc公司成立於澳洲,起初是一家軟體開放商,其後轉而從事利潤更高的專利授權業務。Uniloc本身並不製造專利產品或提供專利服務,而是從其他公司或個人發明者手上購買專利的所有權或使用權,再通過發動專利訴訟賺取巨額利潤。
Uniloc及其子公司已先後在美國發起約200起專利訴訟,還曾於2009年因起訴微軟一炮而紅。早在2003年,Uniloc曾控微軟XP系統的反盜版技術侵權。經六年纏訟,法院於2009年判決微軟需向Uniloc賠償3.88億美元。
  

PS.
Plaintiffs, Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (together “Uniloc”), as and for their complaint against defendants, Tencent America LLC and Tencent Holdings Limited (collectively “Defendants”), allege as follows:

1.   U.S. Patent No. 8,571,194 (“the ‘194 Patent”), entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INITIATING A CONFERENCE CALL issued on October 29, 2013.

System and method for initiating a conference call
US 8571194 B2
ABSTRACT
The present invention is a system and method for initiating conference calls via an instant messaging system to reduce the effort required to initiate and manage the call. The system uses an IM connection between a requesting party and a conference call server to inform the conference call server of the desire to initiate the conference call. The conference call server may initiate the conference call by having involved parties called by a conference bridge, thus reducing the effort required by the parties to join the call.





2.   U.S. Patent No. 7,853,000 (“the ‘000 Patent”), entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INITIATING A CONFERENCE CALL” issued on December 14, 2010.

System and method for initiating a conference call
US 7853000 B2
ABSTRACT
The present invention is a system and method for initiating conference calls via an instant messaging system to reduce the effort required to initiate and manage the call. The system uses an IM connection between a requesting party and a conference call server to inform the conference call server of the desire to initiate the conference call. The conference call server may initiate the conference call by having involved parties called by a conference bridge, thus reducing the effort required by the parties to join the call.





3.   The ‘194 Patent and ‘000 Patents are collectively referred to as the “Patents-in-Suit.” The Patent-in-Suit are part of patent family that has been referenced by hundreds of other patent applications including patents applications by Microsoft Corporation; Yahoo! Inc.; Cisco Technology, Inc.; Sprint Communications Company L.P.; Research In Motion Limited; International Business Machines Corporation; AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.; Qualcomm Incorporated; Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.; T-Mobile USA, Inc.; LG Electronics Inc.; Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.; and Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson.


Original Data:

2016年5月31日 星期二

VoIP-Pal公司VS Apple公司

人:VoIP-Pal公司VS Apple公司
事:指控Apple的智能手機、平板電腦和筆記本侵犯了VoIP-Pal公司的網絡電話專利
時:2016/5
地:USPTO
物:VoIP-Pal公司擁有許多網絡電話(VoIP)專利,一些已經被授予,一些已經提出申請。而Apple侵犯專利的服務主要包括移動聊天工具iMessage、視頻通話服務FaceTime等。VoIP-Pal公司曾經在2013年收購美國電信運營商DigifonicaVoIP-Pal公司宣稱是寬頻VoIP市場的領先者

摘要:
今年來,Apple已經在一些專利侵權訴訟中敗訴,被迫進行經濟賠償。4月份,Apple語音助手工具Siri被法庭判決侵犯他人專利,Apple將賠償2500萬美元。3月份,德國一家法庭判決Apple多個產品侵犯了一家公司的網絡電話專利。2月初,法庭判決AppleiMessageFaceTime等聊天工具,侵犯了美國VirnetX控股公司的互聯網安全技術專利,Apple需賠償6.25億美元。
  

PS.
Plaintiff, Voip-Pal.com, Inc.’s (“VPLM”) Complaint against Defendant Apple, Inc., (“Apple”), alleges infringement of U.S Patent No. 8,542,815 (“the ‘815 patent”, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A), and its continuation patent, U.S Patent No. 9,179,005 (“the ‘005 patent”, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B). VPLM further complains and alleges as follows: 
THE NATURE OF THE ACTION 
1. VPLM is a technical leader in the broadband Voice-over-Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) market with the ownership and development of a portfolio of leading edge VoIP patent applications

1.   Producing routing messages for voice over IP communications
Digifonica (International) Limited US 8542815 B2
ABSTRACT
A process and apparatus to facilitate communication between callers and callees in a system comprising a plurality of nodes with which callers and callees are associated is disclosed. In response to initiation of a call by a calling subscriber, a caller identifier and a callee identifier are received. Call classification criteria associated with the caller identifier are used to classify the call as a public network call or a private network call. A routing message identifying an address, on the private network, associated with the callee is produced when the call is classified as a private network call and a routing message identifying a gateway to the public network is produced when the call is classified as a public network call.


2.   Producing routing messages for voice over IP communications 
Digifonica (International) Limited US 9179005 B2
ABSTRACT
A process and apparatus to facilitate communication between callers and callees in a system comprising a plurality of nodes with which callers and callees are associated is disclosed. In response to initiation of a call by a calling subscriber, a caller identifier and a callee identifier are received. Call classification criteria associated with the caller identifier are used to classify the call as a public network call or a private network call. A routing message identifying an address, on the private network, associated with the callee is produced when the call is classified as a private network call and a routing message identifying a gateway to the public network is produced when the call is classified as a public network call.


Original Data:

2016年3月17日 星期四

荷蘭商Hunter Douglas VS 窗簾大廠億豐

人:荷蘭商Hunter Douglas VS 窗簾大廠億豐
事:億豐及12家美國子公司在美國遭荷蘭商Hunter Douglas控告侵害專利
時:2016/3
地:USPTO
物:該案由加州中區聯邦地院審理,荷蘭商Hunter Douglas主張Norman International12家美國子公司製造、銷售的無拉繩蜂巢簾產品,侵害其美國專利。

摘要:
億豐旗下有七個窗簾工廠,其中兩個專攻美國內需市場,四個在中國大陸;另外,柬埔寨三豐廠在2014年投產,貢獻獲利頗豐,二期新廠去年底完工,預計今年第1季投產。


Note:
Methods for operating window covers
US 8720525 B2
ABSTRACT
A window cover system includes an extendible window cover that has a pair of lift cords. A lift cord pulley shaft is coupled to a pair of spaced apart lift pulleys. A spring drive unit is constructed of a beveled gear system with a first gear that is spring biased to resist rotation of the first gear in one direction of rotation, and a second gear meshed with the first gear. The lift cord pulley shaft is operably coupled to the second gear and is configured to rotate therewith. The spring drive unit has a single output and no input, and the single output is coupled to the first gear.


  
Methods for operating window covers
US 8887788 B2
ABSTRACT
A window cover system includes an extendible window cover with a pair of lift cords. A lift cord pulley shaft is coupled to a pair of spaced apart lift cord pulleys. A spring drive unit has a beveled gear system with a first gear that is spring biased to resist rotation of first gear in one direction of rotation, and a second gear meshed with the first gear. The lift cord pulley shaft extends through the second gear and is configured to rotate therewith.


PS.
Hunter Douglas owns and operates Hunter Douglas Window Fashions, Inc. (“HD Window Fashions”), whose principal place of business is at One Duette Way, Broomfield, CO 80020. 
U.S. Patent No. 8,720,525, entitled “Methods for Operating Window Covers” (the “‘525 Patent”), was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on May 13, 2014. A true and correct copy of the ‘525 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
The Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust is the lawful owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the ‘525 Patent. Hunter Douglas is the exclusive licensee of the ‘525 Patent in the field of window covering products. 
U.S. Patent No. 8,887,788, entitled “Methods for Operating Window Covers” (the “‘788 Patent”), was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on November 18, 2014. A true and correct copy of the ‘788 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
The Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust is the lawful owner of all rights, title, and interest in and to the ‘788 Patent. Hunter Douglas is the exclusive licensee of the ‘788 Patent in the field of window covering products.
Upon information and belief, Defendants, jointly and severally, make, use, have made, offer for sale, sell, and/or import into the United States window coverings and ready-made cordless window blinds including, but not limited to, blinds sold under the brand names Norman® Portrait™, Home Decorators Collection, DesignView, Richfield Studio, RealSimple, and JCP Home (the “Accused Products”), that infringe one or more claims of the ‘525 Patent and/or the ‘788 Patent, including but not limited to, the Norman® Glacier 36x60, HDC Sahara 23x72, HDC Sahara 35x48, HDC Snow Drift 23x48, HDC Mocha 29x72, HDC 14C2130204, and DesignView® Birch 23x48 products. All of the Accused Products are window cover systems as claimed in the ‘525 Patent and the ‘788 Patent.
Upon information and belief, Defendant Nien Made acts as the manufacturer and supplier of the Accused Products, and Defendants Norman International, Norman Colorado, Nien Made USA, Blinds.com, Norman Window, Custom Craft, Norman Arizona, Norman Dallas, Norman Florida, Norman Illinois, Norman Las Vegas, Norman San Jose, and Norman Virginia act as distributors of the Accused Products in the United States.


Original Data:

2016年3月16日 星期三

晶電VS光鋐

人:晶電VS光鋐(可成集團旗下,4956
事:控告光鋐侵犯晶電4項紅外線LED專利
時:2016/3
地:台灣智財法院
物:紅外線LED應用在安控、虹膜辨識以及汽車夜視功能上,以感測、辨識功能為大宗,隨著功率大小不同,單顆報價落差極大,約當每顆新台幣110元之間,部分製程與四元高亮度LED晶粒(Ultra-High Brightness LED Chip)相同。晶電為全球第1大紅光LED製造廠,高亮度紅光LED也是晶電主要的獲利來源。

摘要:
晶電控告光鋐科技之LED產品如型號「BN-D4242J-A3」、「BN-D4242E-A3」等紅外線LED晶粒侵害晶元光電所擁有包括中華民國發明第141155號、第170789號、第202662號及第I283031號等4項發明專利。
據悉,光鋐已經收到晶電的訴訟文件,不過高層認為沒有侵權疑慮,會主張權利,並依照法律訴訟程序進行。

Note:
2005年底,晶電又合併了國聯光電。當時,晶電與國聯分別為國內前兩大LED上游磊晶廠,合併後晶電產品線更加完整,綜效立見,成為全球最大的四元LED廠商,也躍居台灣藍光LED中上游龍頭。合併完成後,國聯最大股東萬海集團也成為晶電的第二大股東,僅次於原來的最大股東億光電子。由於晶電的很多下游客戶與億光有業務競爭關係,為了降低這些客戶的疑慮,億光把晶電的董座禮讓給萬海集團。


PS.
1.晶元光電
I283031 利用低熔點金屬結合化合物半導體與高熱導係數基板的方法
METHOD FOR INTEGRATING COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTOR WITH SUBSTRATE OF HIGH THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY
本發明提供一種結合化合物半導體與高熱導係數基板的方法。本發明運用了一低熔點金屬,因其可於低溫(約在200)下融成液態之導接層來進行導接製程。本發明方法包含:提供一化合物半導體結構,其包括一基板及一磊晶層形成於基板上。然後,形成一第一導接層於磊晶層上。選擇一高熱導係數基板,其熱導係數大於化合物半導體結構之基板。然後,形成一第二導接層於高熱導係數基板上。於一溫度,加壓化合物半導體結構之基板及高熱導係數基板,使得第一導接層及第二導接層接觸,以形成一合金導接層。



2.晶元光電
170789 具有非單晶相中間層之金屬鍵結發光二極體
一種具有非單晶相中間層之金屬鍵結發光二極體及其製法,該製法包含下列步驟:在一第一基板上形成一半導體疊層、一非單晶相中間層、一金屬鍵結層,構成一第一疊層構造;選擇一第二基板上;將第一疊層構造與該第二基板結合在一起,構成一第二疊層構造;以及移除該第一基板。

141155 發光二極體及其製造方法
本發明運用了一高導電性與高反射性之金屬以避免發出之光被基板吸收掉,以及採用可融化成液態之焊接層來進行焊接製程,因此可獲得較佳之導接性質同時可在較低的溫度下進行焊接製程。本發明係提供垂直堆疊之發光二極體晶粒結構,因此僅需要一單一之導線,可使得發光二極體的配線變得更容易施行,並且可以降低製造成本。此外,本發明可以大幅降低發光二極體晶粒之尺寸,且具有較佳之散熱效果,因此發光二極體的效能穩定性較佳且可以被應用於較高的電流強度之下。

202662 於非透明基板製造高發光效率元件的方法
一種於非透明基板製造高發光效率元件的方法,分別於一第一基板上形成一半導體磊晶層、一第一導電層、一反射層及一第一導接層;及於一第二基板上形成一第二導接層。以加溫加壓之方式將該第一及第二導接層接合後去除第一基板及形成一第二導電層後,即可製造有較佳發光效率及較佳散熱效率之發光元件。


Original Data: 




2016年1月30日 星期六

中砂與前主導研發宋健民之專利訴訟

人:中砂(1560 VS 前主導研發的宋健民
事:專利訴訟,日前經美國德拉瓦州法院裁定暫停訴訟程序,將等台灣智財法院針對專利權歸屬做出判決後再審理。
時:20161
地:美國、台灣
物:中砂與宋健民簽署的鑽石陣技術,雙方簽訂17年權利金給付協議,雙方約定自2013年截止後專利權歸中砂,但宋健民私下轉讓,並於2013年向德拉瓦州法院控告中砂鑽石碟等產品侵害其美國登記的三項專利。

摘要:
德拉瓦州法院於美國時間19日根據中砂的主張,裁定停止上開訴訟程序。待台灣智慧財產法院就相關專利權利歸屬做成判決,一旦獲智慧財產法院勝訴判決確定,即可證明宋健民向德拉瓦州法院提起的專利侵權訴訟並無理由,美國法院即毋須進行實質審理。


Note:
Defendants: KINIK COMPANY and WAFERTECH LLC
Upon information and belief, each Defendant has and continues to directly infringe one or more claims of the ’699 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 by making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing and/or providing and causing to be used products that are used to polish semiconductor wafers, which products by way of example include semi-conductor Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) tools such as the CMP Diamond disk (the “Accused Instrumentalities”).
Upon information and belief, Kinik has knowledge of the ’699 patent and has induced and continues to induce others to infringe at least one claim of the ’699 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) by, among other things, and with specific intent or willful blindness, actively aiding and abetting others to infringe, including but not limited to Kinik’s partners and customers, whose use of the Accused Instrumentalities constitutes direct infringement of at least one claim of the ’699 patent.
In particular, Kinik’s actions that aid and abet others such as their partners and customers to infringe include advertising and distributing the Accused Instrumentalities and Case 1:14-cv-01027-UNA Document 1 Filed 08/08/14 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 3 Page 4 of 5 providing instruction materials, training, and services regarding the Accused Instrumentalities. On information and belief, Kinik has engaged in such actions with specific intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting infringement because Kinik has had actual knowledge of the ’699 patent and knowledge that its acts were inducing infringement of the ’699 patent since at least the date Kinik acquired such knowledge.
Upon information and belief, Kinik is liable as a contributory infringer of the ’699 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) by offering to sell, selling and importing into the United States semiconductor wafers polishing tools to be especially made or adapted for use in an infringement of the ’699 patent. The Accused Instrumentalities are material components for use in practicing the ’699 patent and are specifically made and are not a staple article of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.

PS. The disputed patent
Superabrasive tools having substantially leveled particle tips and associated methods
US 8777699 B2
ABSTRACT
Superabrasive tools and methods for making and using the same are provided. In one aspect, for example, a CMP pad dresser includes a first monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on and coupled to one side of a metal support layer and a second monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on and coupled to the metal support layer on an opposite side from the first monolayer. The superabrasive particles of the second monolayer are positioned to have substantially the same distribution as the superabrasive particles of the first monolayer.



Original Data: 


2016年1月21日 星期四

Future Motion VS 中國常州第一貿易商

人:Future Motion VS 中國常州第一貿易商(CHANGZHOU FIRST INTERNATIONAL TRADE CO., LTD.)
事:在美國國際消費電子展(CES),美國法警搜查中國常州第一貿易商之電動滑板
時:2016/1
地:U.S.A
物:美國法警沒收名為Trotter的獨輪自平衡滑板車以及展區的所有宣傳材料。Future Motion的設備名為OneWheel,並在2014CES上就展示了這產品。


摘要:
OneWheel通過Future Motion網站的售價為1500美元。Future Motion創始人凱爾·多爾科森(Kyle Doerksen)於兩年前放棄了在愛達荷州設計師的工作,開發了這款品。他於去年12月向常州第一貿易商發出了禁止通知函,要求國常州第一貿易商停止銷售品,但沒有收到任何回應。在今年CES開展之前,多爾科森曾試圖阻止該公司的參展,但沒有成功。他表示:如果用戶看到市場上充斥低質量的廉價品,那麼將給所有人造成不良印象。我們不希望有人破壞整個市場。


Note:
Future Motion owns all right, title and interest in U.S. Pat. No. D746,928 (“the ‘928 patent”), titled “SKATEBOARD,” including the right to sue thereon and the right to recover for infringement thereof. The ‘928 patent issued January 5, 2016 and will expire January 5, 2030. The ‘928 patent gives Future Motion the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, and selling the invention claimed in Case 2:16-cv-00013-JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5996 the patent within the United States and from importing the invention claimed in the patent into the United States.
Future Motion also owns all right, title and interest in U.S. Pat. No. 9,101,817 (“the ‘817 patent”), titled “SELF-STABILIZING SKATEBOARD,” including the right to sue thereon and the right to recover for infringement thereof. The ‘817 patent issued August 11, 2015 and will expire April 30, 2034. The ‘817 patent gives Future Motion the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, and selling the invention claimed in the patent within the United States and from importing the invention claimed in the patent into the United States.
Defendant Changzhou is making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing a self-balancing electric vehicle under the name “Surfing Electric Scooter” that appears to copy the ONEWHEEL® design, constituting infringement of Future Motion’s ‘928 patent, as well as infringement of at least claims 1, 5 and 7 of Future Motion’s ‘817 patent. Publicly available materials advertising the Surfing Electric Scooter are attached hereto as Exhibit C.

Defendant Changzhou has announced its intention to exhibit and offer for sale the infringing “Surfing Electric Scooter” product at the 2016 International CES show to be held January 6-9 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Attached as Exhibit D hereto is a copy of an advertising flyer distributed by Changzhou in advance of the CES show.


PS.  
公告號:
USD746928S1
公告日:
2016-01-05
發明人:
Doerksen Kyle Jonathan(Palo Alto,CA)
專利權人:
Future Motion, Inc.(Mountain View,CA)






公告號:
US9101817B2
公告日:
2015-08-11
發明人:
Doerksen Kyle Jonathan (Palo Alto,CA)
專利權人:
Future Motion, Inc.(Mountain View,CA)
摘要
An electric vehicle may comprise a board including first and second deck portions each configured to receive a left or right foot of a ride, a wheel assembly disposed between the deck portions and including a ground-contacting element, a motor assembly mounted to the board and configured to rotate the ground-contacting element around an axle to propel the electric vehicle, at least one sensor configured to measure orientation information of the board, and a motor controller configured to receive orientation information measured by the sensor and to cause the motor assembly to propel the electric vehicle based on the orientation information. The electric vehicle may include exactly one ground-contacting element, and the motor may be a hub motor.





Original Data:


2015年12月15日 星期二

BlueSpike指控小米智慧型手機侵權

人:NPE(非執業實體)BlueSpike V.S. 小米
事:BlueSpike指控小米設計或販賣的智慧型手機侵害美國專利8930719
時:2015/12
地:在美國東德州聯邦地區法院馬歇爾分院
物:包括小米的手機品Mi4Mi5Mi5Plus以及紅米系列品被起訴。
摘要:
BlueSpike是業內知名的專利流氓BlueSpike以同一個專利起訴了華為、GoogleYahooFacebook等巨頭。NPE是指那些本身不製造專利品或者提供專利服務,而是從其他公司、研究機構或個人發明者手上購買專利的所有權或使用權,然后專門通過發動專利訴訟賺取巨額利潤的公司或團體。

Note:


Data protection method and device
US 8930719 B2
ABSTRACT
An apparatus and method for encoding and decoding additional information into a digital information in an integral manner. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and device for data protection.


COUNT 1: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,930,719
Blue Without a license or permission from Blue Spike, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe on one or more claims of the ’719 Patent—directly, contributorily, or by inducement—by importing, making, using, offering for sale, or selling products and devices that embody the patented invention, including, without limitation, one or more of the Accused Products, in violation of 35 U.S.C. §271.

Defendant has been and now is indirectly infringing by way of inducing infringement by others and/or contributing to the infringement by others of the ’719 Patent in the State of Texas, in this judicial district, and elsewhere in the United States, by, among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale, and/or selling, without license or authority, products for use in systems that fall within the scope of one or more claims of the ’719 Patent. Such products include, without limitation, one or more of the Accused Products. Such products have no substantial non-infringing uses and are for use in systems that infringe the ’719 Patent. By making, using, importing offering for sale, and/or selling such products, Defendant injured Blue Spike and is thus liable to Blue Spike for infringement of the ’719 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271.

On information and belief, the infringement of the Patent-in-Suit by Defendant has been willful and continues to be willful. Defendant had knowledge of the Patent-inSuit, including but not limited to at least one or more of the following:
a. Through concurrent litigation with Blue Spike. The parties are actively litigating Huawei’s infringement of Blue Spike’s U.S. Patent No. 5,745,569 (the ’569 Patent), Case No. 6:13-cv-774. The ’719 Patent incorporates by reference the ’569 Patent.
b. Defendant has been on notice of the infringing ASLR component of its personalized Android operating system at least as early as the filing of the ’569 complaint. Even so, Defendant continues to provide access to its personalized Android operating system via the website http://en.miui.com. c. Through the filing and service of this Complaint.

On information and belief, Defendant has at least had constructive notice of the ’719 Patent by operation of law


Original Data: