2015年11月19日 星期四

QUAYLE ACTION & WHAT COULD WE DO?

714.14   AMENDMENTS AFTER ALLOWANCE OF ALL CLAIMS [R-08.2012]

Under the decision in Ex parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 1935 C.D. 11; 453 O.G. 213 (Comm’r Pat. 1935), after all claims in an application have been allowed the prosecution of the application on the merits is closed even though there may be outstanding formal objections which preclude fully closing the prosecution.
Amendments touching the merits are treated in a manner similar to amendments after final rejection, though the prosecution may be continued as to the formal matters. See MPEP § 714.12 and § 714.13.
See MPEP § 714.20 for amendments entered in part.
See MPEP § 607 for additional fee requirements.
See MPEP § 714 for non-compliant amendments.
Use form paragraph 7.51 to issue an Ex parte Quayle action.

¶ 7.51    QUAYLE ACTION
This application is in condition for allowance except for the following formal matters: [1].
Prosecution on the merits is closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm’r Pat. 1935).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this action is set to expire TWO MONTHS from the mailing date of this letter.
EXAMINER NOTE:
Explain the formal matters which must be corrected in bracket 1.

37 C.F.R. 1.121   MANNER OF MAKING AMENDMENTS IN APPLICATION.

  • (a) Amendments in applications, other than reissue applications. Amendments in applications, other than reissue applications, are made by filing a paper, in compliance with § 1.52, directing that specified amendments be made.
  • (b) Specification. Amendments to the specification, other than the claims, computer listings (§ 1.96) and sequence listings (§ 1.825), must be made by adding, deleting or replacing a paragraph, by replacing a section, or by a substitute specification, in the manner specified in this section.
  • (c) Claims. Amendments to a claim must be made by rewriting the entire claim with all changes (e.g., additions and deletions) as indicated in this subsection, except when the claim is being canceled. Each amendment document that includes a change to an existing claim, cancellation of an existing claim or addition of a new claim, must include a complete listing of all claims ever presented, including the text of all pending and withdrawn claims, in the application. The claim listing, including the text of the claims, in the amendment document will serve to replace all prior versions of the claims, in the application. In the claim listing, the status of every claim must be indicated after its claim number by using one of the following identifiers in a parenthetical expression: (Original), (Currently amended), (Canceled), (Withdrawn), (Previously presented), (New), and (Not entered).
  • (d) Drawings : One or more application drawings shall be amended in the following manner: Any changes to an application drawing must be in compliance with § 1.84 and must be submitted on a replacement sheet of drawings which shall be an attachment to the amendment document and, in the top margin, labeled “Replacement Sheet”. Any replacement sheet of drawings shall include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is amended. Any new sheet of drawings containing an additional figure must be labeled in the top margin as “New Sheet”. All changes to the drawings shall be explained, in detail, in either the drawing amendment or remarks section of the amendment paper.
  • (e) Disclosure consistency. The disclosure must be amended, when required by the Office, to correct inaccuracies of description and definition, and to secure substantial correspondence between the claims, the remainder of the specification, and the drawings.
  • (f) No new matter. No amendment may introduce new matter into the disclosure of an application.
  • (g) Exception for examiner’s amendments. Changes to the specification, including the claims, of an application made by the Office in an examiner’s amendment may be made by specific instructions to insert or delete subject matter set forth in the examiner’s amendment by identifying the precise point in the specification or the claim(s) where the insertion or deletion is to be made. Compliance with paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), or (c) of this section is not required.
  • (h) Amendment sections. Each section of an amendment document (e.g., amendment to the claims, amendment to the specification, replacement drawings, and remarks) must begin on a separate sheet.
  • (i) Amendments in reissue applications. Any amendment to the description and claims in reissue applications must be made in accordance with § 1.173.
  • (j) Amendments in reexamination proceedings. Any proposed amendment to the description and claims in patents involved in reexamination proceedings must be made in accordance with § 1.530.
  • (k) Amendments in provisional applications. Amendments in provisional applications are not usually made. If an amendment is made to a provisional application, however, it must comply with the provisions of this section. Any amendments to a provisional application shall be placed in the provisional application file but may not be entered.

I.    WHEN APPLICANT MAY AMEND

The applicant may amend:
  • (A) ) before or after the first Office action and also after the second Office actions as specified in 37 CFR 1.112;
  • (B) after final rejection, if the amendment meets the criteria of 37 CFR 1.116;
  • (C) after the date of filing a notice of appeal pursuant to 37 CFR 41.31(a), if the amendment meets the criteria of 37 CFR 41.33; and
  • (D) when and as specifically required by the examiner.
Amendments in provisional applications are not normally made. If an amendment is made to a provisional application, however, it must comply with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.121. Any amendments to a provisional application will be placed in the provisional application file, but may not be entered.

II.   MANNER OF MAKING AMENDMENTS UNDER 37 CFR 1.121

All amendments filed on or after July 30, 2003 must comply with 37 CFR 1.121 as revised in the notice of final rule making published in the Federal Register on June 30, 2003 at 65 Fed. Reg. 38611. The manner of making amendments has been revised to assist in the implementation of beginning-to-end electronic image processing of patent applications. Specifically, changes have been made to facilitate electronic image data capture and processing and streamline the patent application process. If an amendment filed on or after July 30, 2003 does not comply with revised 37 CFR 1.121, the Office will notify applicants via a Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment that the amendment is not accepted.
The revised amendment practice is summarized as follows.

A.   AMENDMENT SECTIONS

Each section of an amendment document (e.g., Specification Amendments, Claim Amendments, Drawing Amendments, and Remarks) must begin on a separate sheet to facilitate separate indexing and electronic scanning of each section of an amendment document for placement in an image file wrapper.
It is recommended that applicants use the following format when submitting amendment papers. The amendment papers should include, in the following order:
  • (A) a cover sheet, or introductory comments, providing the appropriate application information (e.g., application number, applicant, filing date) and which serves as a table of contents to the amendment document by indicating on what page of the amendment document each of the following sections begin;
  • (B) a section (must begin on a separate sheet) entitled “Amendments to the Specification” (if there are any amendments to the specification). This section should include all amendments to the specification including amendments to the abstract of the disclosure. A more detailed discussion is provided in subsection II.B. below;
  • (C) a section (must begin on a separate sheet) entitled “Amendments to the Claims” which includes a complete listing of all claims ever presented in the application (if there are any amendments to the claims). A more detailed discussion is provided in subsection II.C. below;
  • (D) a section (must begin on a separate sheet) entitled “Amendments to the Drawings” in which all changes to the drawings are discussed (if there are any amendments to the drawings). A more detailed discussion is provided in subsection II.D. below;
  • (E) a remarks section (must begin on a separate sheet); and
  • (F) any drawings being submitted including any “Replacement Sheet,” “New Sheet,” or “Annotated Sheet.”

B.   AMENDMENTS TO THE SPECIFICATION

Amendments to the specification, other than the claims, computer listings (37 CFR 1.96) and sequence listings (37 CFR 1.825), must be made by adding, deleting or replacing a paragraph, by replacing a section, or by a substitute specification. In order to delete, replace or add a paragraph to the specification of an application, the amendment must unambiguously identify the paragraph to be modified either by paragraph number (see MPEP § 608.01), page and line, or any other unambiguous method and be accompanied by any replacement or new paragraph(s). Replacement paragraphs must include markings to show the changes. A separate clean version of any replacement paragraphs is not required. Any new paragraphs must be presented in clean form without any markings (i.e., underlining).
Where paragraph numbering has been included in an application as provided in 37 CFR 1.52(b)(6), applicants can easily refer to a specific paragraph by number when presenting an amendment. If a numbered paragraph is to be replaced by a single paragraph, the added replacement paragraph should be numbered with the same number of the paragraph being replaced. Where more than one paragraph is to replace a single original paragraph, the added paragraphs should be numbered using the number of the original paragraph for the first replacement paragraph, followed by increasing decimal numbers for the second and subsequent added paragraphs, e.g., original paragraph [0071] has been replaced with paragraphs [0071], [0071.1], and [0071.2]. If a numbered paragraph is deleted, the numbering of the subsequent paragraphs should remain unchanged.
37 CFR 1.121(b)(1)(ii) requires that the full text of any replacement paragraph be provided with markings to show all the changes relative to the previous version of the paragraph. The text of any added subject matter must be shown by underlining the added text. The text of any deleted subject matter must be shown by strike-through except that double brackets placed before and after the deleted characters may be used to show the deletion of five or fewer consecutive characters (e.g., [[eroor]]). The term “brackets” set forth in 37 CFR 1.121 means square brackets – [ ], and not parentheses – ( ). The text of any deleted subject matter must be shown by being placed within double brackets if strike-through cannot be easily perceived (e.g., deletion of the number “4” must be shown as [[4]]). As an alternative to using double brackets, however, extra portions of text may be included before and after text being deleted, all in strike-through, followed by including and underlining the extra text with the desired change (e.g., number 4 as number 14 as). For added paragraphs, 37 CFR 1.121(b)(1)(iii) requires that the full text of any added paragraph(s) be presented in clean form without any underlining. Similarly, under 37 CFR 1.121(b)(1)(iv), a marked up version does not have to be supplied for any deleted paragraph(s). It is sufficient to merely indicate or identify any paragraph that has been deleted. The instruction to delete may identify a paragraph by its paragraph number, page and line number, or include a few words from the beginning, and end, or the paragraph, if needed for paragraph identification.
Applicants are also permitted to amend the specification by replacement sections (e.g., as provided in 37 CFR 1.77(b), 1.154(b), or 1.163(c)). As with replacement paragraphs, the amended version of a replacement section is required to be provided with markings to show all the changes relative to the previous version of the section. The text of any added subject matter must be shown by underlining the added text. The text of any deleted subject matter must be shown by strike-through except that double brackets placed before and after the deleted characters may be used to show the deletion of five or fewer consecutive characters. The text of any deleted subject matter must be shown by being placed within double brackets if strike-through cannot be easily perceived.
Specifically regarding amendments to the abstract of the disclosure, where the amendments to the abstract are minor in nature, the abstract should be provided as a marked-up version under 37 CFR 1.121(b)(2)(ii) using strike-through and underlining as the methods to show all changes relative to the immediate prior version. Where the abstract is being substantially rewritten and the amended abstract bears little or no resemblance to the previously filed version of the abstract, a new (substitute) abstract may be provided in clean form accompanied by an instruction for the cancellation of the previous version of the abstract. The text of the new abstract must not be underlined. It would be counterproductive for applicant to prepare and provide an abstract so riddled with strike-through and underlining that its meaning and language are obscured from view and comprehension. Whether supplying a marked-up version of a previous abstract or a clean form new abstract, the abstract must comply with 37 CFR 1.72(b) regarding the length and placement of the abstract on a separate sheet of paper.
Applicants are also permitted to amend the specification by submitting a substitute specification, provided the requirements of 37 CFR 1.125(b) and (c)are met. Under 37 CFR 1.125, a clean version of the substitute specification, a separate marked up version showing the changes in the specification relative to the previous version, and a statement that the substitute specification contains no new matter are required.
Any previously deleted paragraph or section can only be reinstated by a subsequent amendment presenting the previously deleted subject matter. A direction by applicant to remove a previously entered amendment will not be permitted.

C.   AMENDMENTS TO THE CLAIMS

Each amendment document that includes a change to an existing claim, including the deletion of an existing claim, or submission of a new claim, must include a complete listing of all claims ever presented (including previously canceled and non-entered claims) in the application. After each claim number, the status identifier of the claim must be presented in a parenthetical expression, and the text of each claim under examination as well as all withdrawn claims (each with markings if any, to show current changes) must be presented. The listing will serve to replace all prior versions of the claims in the application.
  • (A) Status Identifiers: The current status of all of the claims in the application, including any previously canceled or withdrawn claims, must be given. Status is indicated in a parenthetical expression following the claim number by one of the following status identifiers: (original), (currently amended), (previously presented), (canceled), (withdrawn), (new), or (not entered). The status identifier (withdrawn – currently amended) is also acceptable for a withdrawn claim that is being currently amended. See paragraph (E) below for acceptable alternative status identifiers.
    Claims added by a preliminary amendment must have the status identifier (new) instead of (original), even when the preliminary amendment is present on the filing date of the application and such claim is treated as part of the original disclosure. If applicant files a subsequent amendment, applicant must use the status identifier (previously presented) if the claims are not being amended, or (currently amended) if the claims are being amended, in the subsequent amendment. Claims that are canceled by a preliminary amendment that is present on the filing date of the application are required to be listed and must have the status identifier (canceled) in the preliminary amendment and in any subsequent amendment.
    The status identifier (not entered) is used for claims that were previously proposed in an amendment (e.g., after-final) that was denied entry.
    In an amendment submitted in a U.S. national stage application, claims that were present on the international filing date or rectified pursuant to PCT Rule 91 must have the status identifier (original); claims that were amended or added under PCT Article 19 or 34 with effect in the U.S. national stage application must have the status identifier (previously presented); and claims that were canceled pursuant to PCT Article 19 or 34 with effect in the U.S. national stage application must have the status identifier (canceled). If the amendment submitted in the U.S. national stage application is making a change in a claim, the status identifier (currently amended) must be used for that claim.
    For any amendment being filed in response to a restriction or election of species requirement and any subsequent amendment, any claims which are non-elected must have the status identifier (withdrawn). Any non-elected claims which are being amended must have either the status identifier (withdrawn) or (withdrawn – currently amended) and the text of the non-elected claims must be presented with markings to indicate the changes. Any non-elected claims that are being canceled must have the status identifier (canceled).
  • (B) Markings to Show the Changes: All claims being currently amended must be presented with markings to indicate the changes that have been made relative to the immediate prior version. The changes in any amended claim must be shown by strike-through (for deleted matter) or underlining (for added matter) with 2 exceptions: (1) for deletion of five or fewer consecutive characters, double brackets may be used (e.g., [[eroor]]); (2) if strike-through cannot be easily perceived (e.g., deletion of number “4” or certain punctuation marks), double brackets must be used (e.g., [[4]]). As an alternative to using double brackets, however, extra portions of text may be included before and after text being deleted, all in strike-through, followed by including and underlining the extra text with the desired change (e.g., number 4 as number 14 as ). An accompanying clean version is not required and should not be presented. Only claims of the status “currently amended” or “withdrawn” will include markings.
    Any claims added by amendment must be indicated as “new” and the text of the claim must not be underlined.
  • (C) Claim Text: The text of all pending claims under examination and withdrawn claims must be submitted each time any claim is amended. The text of pending claims not being currently amended, including withdrawn claims, must be presented in clean version, i.e., without any markings. Any claim presented in clean version will constitute an assertion that it has not been changed relative to the immediate prior version except to omit markings that may have been present in the immediate prior version of the claims. A claim being canceled must be indicated as “canceled;” the text of the claim must not be presented. Providing an instruction to cancel is optional. Canceled and not entered claims must be listed by only the claim number and status identifier, without presenting the text of the claims. When applicant submits the text of canceled or not-entered claims in the amendment, the Office may accept such an amendment, if the amendment otherwise complies with 37 CFR 1.121, instead of sending out a notice of non-compliant amendment to reduce the processing time.
  • (D) Claim Numbering: All of the claims in each amendment paper must be presented in ascending numerical order. Consecutive canceled or not entered claims may be aggregated into one statement (e.g., Claims 1 – 5 (canceled)).
A canceled claim can be reinstated only by a subsequent amendment presenting the claim as a new claim with a new claim number. The original numbering of the claims must be preserved throughout the prosecution. When claims are canceled, the remaining claims must not be renumbered. For example, when applicant cancels all of the claims in the original specification and adds a new set of claims, the claim listing must include all of the canceled claims with the status identifier (canceled) (the canceled claims may be aggregated into one statement). The new claims must be numbered consecutively beginning with the number next following the highest numbered claim previously presented (whether entered or not) in compliance with37 CFR 1.126.
Example of listing of claims:
Claims 1-5 (canceled)
Claim 6 (withdrawn): A process for molding a bucket.
Claim 7 (previously presented): A bucket with a handle.
Claim 8 (currently amended): A bucket with a green blue handle.
Claim 9 (withdrawn): The process for molding a bucket of claim 6 using molten plastic material.
Claim 10 (original): The bucket of claim 8 with a wooden handle.
Claim 11 (canceled)
Claim 12 (previously presented): A bucket having a circumferential upper lip.
Claim 13 (not entered)
Claim 14 (new): A bucket with plastic sides and bottom.
  • (E) Acceptable Alternative Status Identifiers : To prevent delays in prosecution, the Office will waive certain provisions of 37 CFR 1.121 and accept alternative status identifiers not specifically set forth in 37 CFR 1.121(c). See Acceptance of Certain Non-Compliant Amendments Under 37 CFR 1.121(c), O.G. (July 5, 2005). Accordingly claim listings that include alternative status identifiers as set forth below may be accepted if the amendment otherwise complies with 37 CFR 1.121.
Status Identifiers Set Forth in 37 CFR 1.121(c)Acceptable Alternatives
1. OriginalOriginal Claim; and Originally Filed Claim
2. Currently amendedPresently amended; and Currently amended claim
3. Canceled
Canceled without prejudice; Cancel; Canceled; Canceled herein; Previously canceled; Canceled claim; and Deleted
4. WithdrawnWithdrawn from consideration; Withdrawn – new; Withdrawn claim; and Withdrawn – currently amended
5. Previously presented
Previously amended; Previously added; Previously submitted; and Previously presented claim
6. New
Newly added; and New claim
7. Not enteredNot entered claim
The Office may also accept additional variations of the status identifiers provided in 37 CFR 1.121(c) not listed above if an Office personnel determines that the status of the claims is accurate and clear. When accepting alternative status identifiers, the examiner is not required to correct the status identifiers using an examiner’s amendment. Applicant will not be notified and will not be required to submit a corrective compliant amendment. The examiner does not need to make a statement on the record that the alternative status identifiers have been accepted.

D.   AMENDMENTS TO THE DRAWING

E.   EXAMINER’S AMENDMENTS

F.   NON-COMPLIANT AMENDMENTS

If an amendment submitted on or after July 30, 2003, fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.121 (as revised on June 30, 2003), the Office will notify applicant by a Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment, Form PTOL-324, that the amendment fails to comply with the requirements of 37 CFR 1.121 and identify: (1) which section of the amendment is non-compliant (e.g., the amendments to the claims section); (2) items that are required for compliance (e.g., a claim listing in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(c)); and (3) the reasons why the section of the amendment fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.121 (e.g., the status identifiers are missing). The type of amendment will determine whether applicant will be given a period of time in which to comply with the rule and whether applicant’s reply to a notice should consist of the corrected section of the amendment (e.g., a complete claim listing in compliance of 37 CFR 1.121(c)) instead of the entire corrected amendment. If the noncompliant amendment is:
  • (A) A preliminary amendment filed after the filing date of the application , the technical support staff (TSS) will send the notice which sets a time period of 30 days or one month, whichever is later, for reply. No extensions of time are permitted. Failure to submit a timely reply will result in the application being examined without entry of the preliminary amendment. Applicant’s reply is required to include the corrected section of the amendment.
  • (B) A preliminary amendment that is present on the filing date of the application , the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) will send applicant a notice (e.g., Notice to File Corrected Application Papers) which sets a time period of 2 months for reply. Extensions of time are available under 37 CFR 1.136(a). Failure to reply to the (OPAP) notice will result in abandonment of the application. Applicant’s reply is required to include either a substitute specification under 37 CFR 1.125 if the amendment is to the specification, or a complete claim listing under 37 CFR 1.121(c) if the amendment is to the claims.
  • (C) A non-final amendment including an amendment filed as a submission for an RCE, the TSS will send the notice which sets a time period of 30 days or one month, whichever is later, for reply. Extensions of time are available under 37 CFR 1.136(a). Failure to reply to this notice will result in abandonment of the application. Applicant’s reply is required to include the corrected section of the amendment.
  • (D) An after-final amendment , the amendment will be forwarded in unentered status to the examiner. In addition to providing reasons for non-entry when the amendment is not in compliance with 37 CFR 1.116 (e.g., the proposed amendment raises new issues that would require further consideration and/or search), the examiner should also indicate in the advisory action any non-compliance in the after-final amendment. The examiner should attach a Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment to the advisory action. The notice provides no new time period for correcting the non-compliance. The time period for reply continues to run from the mailing of the final Office action. Applicant still needs to respond to the final Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. If the applicant wishes to file another after-final amendment, the entire corrected amendment (not only the corrected section of the amendment) must be submitted within the time period set forth in the final Office action.
  • (E) A supplemental amendment filed when there is no suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) or (c), the amendment will be forwarded to the examiner. Such a supplemental amendment is not entered as a matter of right. See 37 CFR 1.111(a)(2)(ii). The examiner will notify the applicant if the amendment is not approved for entry. The examiner may use form paragraph 7.147. See MPEP § 714.03(a).
  • (F) A supplemental amendment filed within a suspension period under 37 CFR 1.103(a) or (c) (e.g., applicant requested a suspension of action at the time of filing an RCE), the TSS will send the notice which sets a time period of 30 days or one month, whichever is later, for reply. No extensions of time are permitted. Failure to submit a timely reply will result in the application being examined without entry of the supplemental amendment. Applicant’s reply is required to include the corrected section of the amendment.
  • (G) An amendment filed in response to a Quayle action , the TSS will send the notice which sets a time period of 30 days or one month, whichever is later, for reply. Extensions of time are available under 37 CFR 1.136(a). Failure to reply to this notice will result in abandonment of the application. Applicant’s reply is required to include the corrected section of the amendment.
  • (H) An after-allowance amendment under 37 CFR 1.312, the amendment will be forwarded to the examiner. Amendments under 37 CFR 1.312 are not entered as matter of right. The examiner will notify the applicant if the amendment is not approved for entry. The examiner may attach a Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment (37 CFR 1.121) to the form PTO-271, Response to Rule 312 Communication (see MPEP § 714.16(d)). The notice provides no new time period. If applicant wishes to file another after-allowance amendment under 37 CFR 1.312, the entire corrected amendment must be submitted before the payment of the issue fee.
Any amendments (including after-final amendments) that add new claims in excess of the number of claims previously paid for in an application must be accompanied by the payment of the required excess claims fees. Failure to pay the excess claims fees will result in non-entry of the amendment. SeeMPEP § 607.

2015年11月13日 星期五

研發以雷達感測動物或人類心跳與脈搏的系統

人:中山大學(電機系教授洪子聖)
事:研發以雷達感測動物或人類心跳與脈搏的系統
時:2015/11
地:台灣及美國
物:美商有意利用此裝置偵測牛隻健康狀態,例如狂牛症發生時,心跳和呼吸都會明顯加速,希望透過無線偵測來偵測。
摘要:
科技部一年前開始推動法人鏈結產學合作試行計畫,從5000件大學的研發與專利中,盤點出200件具有產學合作潛力的研究,並進一步讓12案可以實際商品化或技轉。第一次洽談時授權金僅5萬美元,透過工研院打造第一台雛形機,能實際在牧場操作後,再度洽談的授權金就飆高至200萬美元;且每年美商賣出的機器都可以抽3%回饋金,創下台灣技轉電子通訊類研發的最高金額。未來中山大學將繼續研發應用到人類。

Note:

I495451
非接觸式生理信號感測系統與其感測方法
NON-CONTACT VITAL SIGN SENSING SYSTEM AND SENSING METHOD USING THE SAME
非接觸式生理信號感測系統包括:生理信號感測模組與至少一身體移動干擾抵銷模組。生理信號感測模組與該至少一身體移動干擾抵銷模組皆處於自我注入鎖定(self injection locking,SIL)。生理信號感測模組偵測受測者之同向性生理信號。生理信號感測模組與該至少一身體移動干擾抵銷模組之間達成相互注入鎖定(mutual injection locking,MIL),以偵測受測者之反向性身體移動信號,進而抵銷受測者之身體移動所引起的干擾。






Original Data: 

2015年11月10日 星期二

GoPro Hero4 Session V.S Polaroid Cube

人:GoPro Hero4 Session V.S Polaroid Cube
事:起因是穿戴式攝影機生產商 GoPro 侵犯了Polaroid Cube的一項設計專利
時:2015/11
地:U.S.A.
物:GoPro Hero4 Session是一款微型攝影機,外形設計與 Polaroid Cube 極為類似。在今年 5 月,Polaroid Cube 已經申請專利,比GoPro Hero4 Session 上市還早了 2 個月。
摘要:
GoPro 方面回應稱,Session 在歐盟為持有若干項專利,其塑膠殼外觀設計也在美國受到專利保護。這些專利均在今年 3 月獲得批准。「GoPro 開放 Hero4 Session 的時間大大早於競爭對手遞交專利申請的時間。」有鑒於兩款產品的高度相似,聯邦陪審團將需要根據這些相似性來判定 GoPro 是否對 Polaroid Cube 專利構成侵權。C&AMarketing 專利描述只有 12 個單字——The ornamental design for a cubic action camera, as shown and described.
——C&AMarketing 在申請中提供了 7 張設計草圖,但並未提及整個鏡頭的體積大小。


Note:

US D730423 S1
Cubic action camera 
The ornamental design for a cubic action camera, as shown and described.


Original Data:



2015年11月9日 星期一

金屬中心奪國際發明展1金1銀

人:金屬中心
事:以「斷裂骨之固定植體」與「檢驗試管整備裝置」,分別奪得「2015臺北國際發明暨技術交易展」金牌獎及銀牌獎
時:2015/11
地:台灣台北
物:「斷裂骨之固定植體」技術由金屬中心與多位骨科臨床醫師共同研發。「檢驗試管整備裝置」係由金屬中心與高雄醫學大學、高雄市立小港醫院共同合作開發。
摘要:
「斷裂骨之固定植體」技術,可改善傳統固定植體設計及手術缺點,幫助髖骨斷裂患者,減少骨刺穿及萎縮情形,並降低避免感染情形與手術風險。
「檢驗試管整備裝置」可改善目前醫檢試管黏貼條碼由人工貼取的方式,減輕醫護人員的負擔。該裝置主要是備管內容除可搭載不同尺寸試管與健康檢查常用之尿管,以滿足各家廠牌之規格需求,並與醫院資訊系統連結,可達到自動備管、貼標、列印報到單與問卷方式。

Note:

I465223 斷裂骨之固定植體
一種斷裂骨之固定植體,包括有一骨釘,該骨釘具有一連接段、一與該連接段一端相連接之錐體段,及一與該錐體段相連接之螺紋段,其中,該螺紋段與該連接段分別位於該錐體段的兩相反端,且該螺紋段並具有一球形端頭,該錐體段的斷面直徑是由該連接段朝該螺紋段方向漸形縮小。藉此不易刺穿斷裂骨,且可分散應力,降低斷裂骨之負荷,並能提高耐用性。




I468692 檢驗試管整備裝置
一種檢驗試管整備裝置,用以解決習知檢驗試管整備裝置備管效率不佳的問題。本發明的檢驗試管整備裝置包含:一基座及設於該基座的一試管儲放架、一條碼標籤處理模組、一選管模組、一中繼持盤模組及一補管模組。該選管模組由一移轉組件載置數個試管托盤,及使該數個試管托盤之其一與一貼標夾具組件對位,該貼標夾具組件由一第一夾具向相對位的試管托盤夾取試管並將試管移至該條碼標籤處理模組;該中繼持盤模組由一第二夾具向該移轉組件夾取其餘試管托盤;該補管模組由一第三夾具向該試管儲放架夾取試管,並將試管移至該中繼持盤模組所夾持的試管托盤。




Original  Data:


2015年11月4日 星期三

苹果汽车藏在这八大专利里

人:苹果公司
事:开发一款电动汽车
时:2015/9,目标希望在2019年面世。
地:美國及全球
物:「显示屏或许是苹果汽车的重要组成部分」、「思考如何使导航更容易」、「通过手机对汽车进行解锁和除霜」、「区域范围设定技术可以让汽车与手机在一定范围内进行通信」、「授权另一部手机连接你的电脑」、「让停车变得更简单」、「通过手机可在你开车的时候将你反锁在车中」、「自动驾驶功能」
摘要:

2009年申请了一项专利「可编程触摸显示屏和人机交互界面的改善,可应用于车用仪表和远程信息处理」。允许乘客和司机坐在座位上,通过触屏技术来实现一系列的功能,包括电话会议以及视频游戏等。该专利同时也说明研究人员正在努力通过声音识别来进行操作(就像Siri一样)。
2011年申请的专利允许另一部手机也可以控制你的汽车,这这达到家庭共享。它也允许你控制你的引擎,从而可以做到防偷。
2012年申请的专利介绍了司机如何通过手机来控制他们的汽车。相对应的功能包括「汽车气候调节,导航简介,安全功能或者音乐选择等,以及通过手机来定位停车位置,并给出与人当前位置的相对位置。」
2013年申请的专利介绍是无线设备与车辆外部显示器的连接问题。显示器具有地图的动画,通过手指的控制可以很容易进行放大和缩小操作。在CarPlay上已经开始看到这种技术。
2014年申请刚发表的的专利更像是之前提到的2012年相关专利的延续。区域范围设定技术意味着只有在一定范围内你的电话才能和手机进行通讯。当在通讯区域内时,手机可以记录汽车的停放位置。你可以启动汽车,对座椅进行加热,并且播放音乐。这项专利可让你的手机不用随时都和你的汽车进行数据交换,从而节省电能。
2014年申请的专利可有效保护你平板电脑的安全。平板装置具有的传感器会识别何时是适合放置的,并且允许其可以无线方式自动和汽车进行连接。
2014年申请的专利使得移动设备具有记录并且定位所停汽车的能力。你的手机可以感知你是否已经停好了汽车,并且自动记录器位置。2013年一项类似的专利则允许使用者的手机可以在信号非常弱的环境下找到你停车的位置。



Original Data:
http://it.sohu.com/20151103/n425071297.shtml