根據美國MPEP 1504.06所述內容,”There
are generally two types of double patenting rejections. One is the “same
invention” type double patenting rejection based on35
U.S.C. 171 which states in the singular that an inventor
“may obtain a patent.” The second is the “nonstatutory-type” double
patenting rejection based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in
public policy and which is primarily intended to prevent prolongation of the
patent term by prohibiting claims in a second patent not patentably distinct
from claims in a first patent. … Nonstatutory categories of double patenting rejections which are not
the “same invention” type may be overcome by the submission of a terminal
disclaimer. … The purpose of a terminal disclaimer is to obviate a double
patenting rejection by removing potential harm to the public by issuing a
second patent. See MPEP § 804.
If the issue of double patenting is raised between a patent and
a continuing application, examiners are reminded that this ground of
rejection can only be made when the filing of the continuing application is
voluntary and not the direct, unmodified result of restriction requirement
under 35 U.S.C. 121. See MPEP
§ 804.01.”
Note:
terminal disclaimer(期末拋棄)的程序係將後案(如CIP案、CA案)與母案之專利期限的終止期統一為同一日(同母案)。
沒有留言:
張貼留言